9 February 2026
Real estate deals can get messy. Imagine you’ve found your dream home, signed a contract, and suddenly, the seller backs out. Or maybe you’re the seller, and the buyer refuses to close the deal. What happens then?
This is where specific performance comes into play—a legal remedy that forces a party to fulfill their contractual obligations. While most real estate disputes end with financial settlements, sometimes money isn’t enough. Some deals are so unique that forcing completion is the only fair solution.
But is specific performance always the right move? Let’s break it down. 
Unlike monetary damages, which compensate for losses, specific performance ensures the contract’s original terms are honored. Courts typically grant this remedy when financial compensation wouldn’t be adequate—especially when the property is unique.
For example, imagine you’re buying a historic home with distinct architecture or a beachfront property with a one-of-a-kind view. If the seller backs out, merely compensating you with money doesn’t replace the lost opportunity. In such cases, courts may enforce specific performance.

- Scarcity of the Property – If you've spent years searching for a property in a competitive market, losing it due to a seller’s cold feet isn’t fair.
- Increased Market Prices – If property values have risen after signing the contract, finding a similar home might cost you much more.
- Emotional Attachment – Some properties have sentimental value. Maybe it's your childhood home or falls within a perfect school district.
For buyers, specific performance can ensure they get exactly what they bargained for instead of just a financial settlement.
- A Falling Market – If property values drop after signing the contract, a seller might insist the buyer complete the transaction at the original price.
- Difficult Selling Conditions – If a seller already moved out or made other arrangements assuming the sale would close, a buyer backing out can cause major disruptions.
- Unique Buyer Match – Certain properties require specific buyers, such as commercial spaces with particular business permits.
However, courts tend to grant specific performance to buyers more often than to sellers. Why? Because real estate is unique for buyers, but sellers can usually find another buyer, making monetary damages a more practical solution for them.
- The contract is unfair or unclear – If terms are overly complex, one-sided, or ambiguous, enforcement becomes tricky.
- Hardship or unfairness – If compelling a party to perform the contract would cause extreme hardship, courts might deny the request.
- Lack of proper financing – If a buyer can't secure funds, forcing the deal isn’t practical.
- Changed circumstances – For example, if zoning laws change or the property is damaged before closing, enforcing the original contract may no longer be reasonable.
Before entering a real estate contract, make sure everything is legally sound. And if you ever find yourself in a dispute, don’t hesitate to seek legal advice. After all, real estate is one of the biggest investments you’ll ever make—you deserve to protect your rights.
all images in this post were generated using AI tools
Category:
Real Estate ContractsAuthor:
Camila King
rate this article
1 comments
Freya Clayton
This article beautifully explains the importance of specific performance in real estate contracts. Understanding these terms can truly empower both buyers and sellers.
February 10, 2026 at 4:12 AM